{"id":4005,"date":"2017-04-13T03:26:11","date_gmt":"2017-04-13T03:26:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.benjamincheah.com\/?p=4005"},"modified":"2017-04-13T03:26:11","modified_gmt":"2017-04-13T03:26:11","slug":"marital-rape-laws-expose-men-to-abuse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/?p=4005","title":{"rendered":"Marital Rape Laws Expose Men to Abuse"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-4009\" src=\"https:\/\/www.benjamincheah.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/image-8.png\" alt=\"image-8\" width=\"520\" height=\"720\" srcset=\"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/image-8.png 520w, https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/image-8-217x300.png 217w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 520px) 100vw, 520px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Two days ago, the <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170413030911\/http:\/\/www.straitstimes.com\/singapore\/protecting-married-women\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Straits Times<\/a> reported an impending review of Singapore\u2019s law on marital rape to \u201censure that married women have the same protection against violence as unmarried women\u201d. Singapore\u2019s legal code is built on English Common Law, which includes immunity from prosecution for men who have sex with their wives.<\/p>\n<p>Removal of this immunity would expose the other half of humanity to legal jeopardy and manipulation.<\/p>\n<p>Marriage is the recognition and legitimisation of a relationship between two parties. Marriage is a public, binding and lasting declaration of consent to sexual intercourse. Rape within marriage cannot exist.<\/p>\n<h1>The Other Half of the Sky<\/h1>\n<p>This review of marital rape is framed as \u2018women\u2019s rights\u2019. In other words, it codifies the myth that men are the sole perpetrators of rape and women the sole victims\u2014a myth that Singapore continues to perpetuate by defining rape as a crime committed only by men on women. It sweeps aside men who were coerced to penetrate someone else with their body parts. It exposes married men to false rape accusations and place undue legal burden on them.<\/p>\n<p>The report says:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Government may be wary that abolishing immunity may lead to false allegations of rape, or open up criminal proceedings that are overly intrusive to families.<br \/>\nBut these are issues that can be worked out through consulting various stakeholders.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I am not convinced. Abolishing immunity <em>will<\/em> lead to false allegations. If a woman feels her husband offended her and wants to spite him, all she has to do is to have sex with him one night and accuse him of marital rape in the morning.<\/p>\n<p>Since the \u2018evidence\u2019 states there was sexual contact, the onus is now on the husband to prove that he <em>didn\u2019t<\/em> rape her or threaten to use violence unless she has sex with him. This is compounded by the fact that Singapore does not have Miranda rights. Suspects only have access to lawyers after the initial interview\u2014and if the police and the public prosecutor decide to press charges, an innocent man is out of luck. It will be tempting for irresponsible police officers to pressure the husband into confessing for a crime he didn\u2019t commit to speedily clear cases and to \u2018protect women\u2019. Regardless of what happens, the man will be dragged through the mud.<\/p>\n<p>And if the woman were the manipulative sort, the criminal investigation is all the evidence she needs to file for divorce and a rich alimony.<\/p>\n<p>If a system makes it easy for unscrupulous women to cry rape, it will happen. In America, between <a href=\"https:\/\/icdv.idaho.gov\/conference\/handouts\/False-Allegations.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">6<\/a> to <a href=\"https:\/\/ucr.fbi.gov\/crime-in-the-u.s\/1996\/96sec2.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">8%<\/a> of rape accusations are false. In India, it is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dnaindia.com\/india\/report-53-rape-cases-filed-between-april-2013-and-july-2013-false-delhi-commission-of-women-2023334\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">53%<\/a>. Even if an allegation is proven false, the investigation would have caused great deal of emotional, financial and psychological harm to the accused.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Consulting various stakeholders\u2019 is meaningless. The government did not consult stakeholders when formulating the White Paper on Population, its policies on new media, or, indeed, anything it have already made up their mind to achieve. The government may claim it will solicit feedback, but whether it will listen is something else. With the People\u2019s Action Party retaining absolute dominance in Parliament, if the PAP believes something should be law, it will be law, regardless of stakeholders think\u2014and nothing will stop them.<\/p>\n<h1>The Question No One Asks<\/h1>\n<p>Why do you want to be married to someone you don\u2019t want to have sex with?<\/p>\n<p>This is the question no one is asking about marital rape. Marriage is a partnership involving sexual rights and responsibilities, and holds both parties to uphold their duties of fulfilling the other&#8217;s sexual needs and desires. If either party consistently demonstrates an unwillingness to accommodate the other, the partnership is broken. In such a state, there are three legitimate responses: acceptance and adaptation, therapy and reconciliation, or divorce.<\/p>\n<p>If you want the benefits of marriage, you must also fulfil the duties of marriage. If you do not want to fulfil the duties of marriage, then the marriage is over.<\/p>\n<p>Marriage is a lasting declaration of consent. Defining marital rape as a crime opens the possibility of the wife unilaterally deciding to withdraw consent at any time without necessarily informing the husband and exposing him to criminal investigation. This isn\u2019t just irresponsible and unfair; it opens the possibility for abuse.<\/p>\n<p>If a woman no longer consents to have sex with her husband, she should revoke consent through divorce. If a woman believes that her husband is so violent that he will use force to coerce her into sex, then she should either divorce him and seek help, or better yet, <em>not marry him at all<\/em>. If a woman&#8217;s husband insists on having sex with her when she doesn&#8217;t feel up to it and she feels it is not right, she should either discuss it with him to resolve the issue, or file for divorce. Instead of abdicating all responsibility to the state, she should exercise it for herself.<\/p>\n<h1>Law is Not the Answer<\/h1>\n<p>The law is not a first resort. It is the last. Before entering a marriage, the parties involved must be certain that they are both willing to fulfil the other&#8217;s sexual needs. If either partner is not, rushing into marriage is a set-up for disaster. If either or both parties no longer wish to meet these obligations within a marriage, and do not wish to compromise or work around it, the responsible thing to do is to file for divorce.<\/p>\n<p>A law that places undue burden on men is a law that will be abused. The law is not a hammer with which to beat the other party into psychological submission, nor to extract benefits from a former husband, nor to spite him. It is reserved for punishing and deterring actual criminals, not to take sides in a domestic dispute.<\/p>\n<p>The answer to the problem of a person coercing his spouse into sex is not more law. It is teaching men and women the responsibilities of marriage and imparting life and relationship skills. It is educating people to recognise abusers and dissuading them from marrying such people. It is reaching out to abuse victims and getting them to leave abusers as quickly as possible.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, it is teaching men and women to be responsible adults.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Two days ago, the Straits Times reported an impending review of Singapore\u2019s law on marital rape to \u201censure that married women have the same protection against violence as unmarried women\u201d. Singapore\u2019s legal code is built on English Common Law, which includes immunity from prosecution for men who have sex with their wives. Removal of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[192,242,288,295],"class_list":["post-4005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-meditations","tag-law","tag-politics","tag-singapore","tag-social-justice"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4005"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4005"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4005\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kitsuncheah.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}